
78% of enterprise buyers cite security, compliance, and administrative controls as the top three factors when evaluating new software platforms, yet fewer than 40% of SaaS tools meet baseline enterprise requirements out of the box.
Scribe offers comprehensive enterprise features including SSO, SAML, advanced data governance, and multi-team management with custom pricing. Cap, while open-source and cost-effective, provides basic enterprise features like SLAs, priority support, and self-hosting options but lacks the depth of enterprise controls found in Scribe. For organizations seeking a truly enterprise-ready solution that combines the best of both worlds—advanced AI automation, enterprise-grade security, and scalable team management—Guidde delivers superior enterprise capabilities at a fraction of the cost.
Enterprise readiness isn't just about feature checklists—it's about whether a platform can scale securely across your organization without creating compliance risks, security vulnerabilities, or administrative nightmares. The wrong choice can lead to shadow IT proliferation, data breaches, failed audits, and thousands of hours wasted on workarounds. With 2026 seeing increased regulatory scrutiny around data privacy (GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2) and AI governance, choosing a platform that's truly enterprise-ready has never been more critical.
As organizations accelerate digital transformation and implement AI-powered workflows, the gap between consumer-grade tools and enterprise requirements has widened dramatically. Scribe and Cap represent two fundamentally different approaches to screen recording and documentation: Scribe as a purpose-built enterprise documentation platform, and Cap as an open-source, privacy-first screen recorder positioning itself as a Loom alternative.
This comparison examines their enterprise readiness across seven critical dimensions: security and compliance, authentication and access control, data governance, administrative controls, scalability, support and SLAs, and procurement processes. We'll assess not just what features exist, but how well each platform addresses the real-world challenges enterprises face when deploying tools across thousands of users.
Both platforms have made significant strides in 2026, but the maturity gap is substantial. Understanding where each platform excels—and where critical gaps remain—is essential for making an informed decision that won't come back to haunt your IT, security, and compliance teams.
Scribe is an AI-powered workflow documentation platform designed specifically for enterprise teams to capture, centralize, and scale process knowledge. Launched as a browser extension and evolved into a comprehensive enterprise platform, Scribe automatically generates step-by-step guides as users complete tasks across web, desktop, and mobile applications.
By 2026, Scribe has positioned itself as 'the workflow AI platform' and is trusted by 45% of Fortune 500 companies on paid plans. The platform has evolved beyond simple screen capture to include Scribe Optimize, an AI-powered workflow intelligence tool that discovers inefficiencies and recommends process improvements across organizations.
Scribe's enterprise tier is purpose-built for regulated industries and large organizations with complex security and compliance requirements. Key enterprise capabilities include:
Scribe reports that customers save an average of 41.6 hours per user per month and achieve 98% procedure compliance rates when using the platform. The enterprise tier pricing is custom and varies based on modules selected, team size, and required features.
Cap is an open-source screen recording platform that positions itself as 'the open source alternative to Loom.' Launched in 2024 and rapidly gaining traction (16.4k+ GitHub stars by 2026), Cap emphasizes privacy, data sovereignty, and cross-platform reliability with native apps for macOS and Windows.
Unlike traditional SaaS tools, Cap offers multiple deployment models: cloud-hosted SaaS, self-hosted on custom S3 buckets, or fully local recording with no cloud dependency. This flexibility appeals to security-conscious organizations and teams with strict data residency requirements.
Cap's enterprise offering, launched in late 2025, focuses on deployment flexibility and core enterprise needs rather than deep administrative controls. As of January 2026, Cap's enterprise tier is still in early stages but includes:
Cap's core differentiators are open-source transparency (see exactly how the platform works), data ownership (your storage, your rules), and cost efficiency (Desktop License at $58 lifetime or $29/year, Pro at $8.16/month per user annually). The platform includes AI-powered features like auto-generated titles, summaries, transcriptions, and clickable chapters.
However, Cap's enterprise tier lacks the granular administrative controls, compliance certifications, and data governance features that characterize mature enterprise platforms. It's better suited for privacy-conscious mid-market companies than heavily regulated enterprises requiring SOC 2, HIPAA, or detailed audit trails.
| Enterprise Feature | Scribe Enterprise | Cap Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | Custom (reports suggest $39/user/month + $1,300 base fee for small teams) | Custom quote (Pro starts at $8.16/mo per user annually) |
| Authentication | ✓ SAML SSO ✓ SCIM provisioning ✓ Role-based access control |
✓ SAML SSO ✗ SCIM provisioning ✗ Granular RBAC |
| Data Governance | ✓ Auto PII/PHI redaction ✓ Enforced redaction policies ✓ Central document management ✓ Authenticated viewers ✓ IP whitelisting |
✓ Custom S3 bucket support ✓ Self-hosting options ✓ Local-only recording ✗ Automated redaction ✗ Central policy enforcement |
| Multi-Team Management | ✓ Multiple workspaces ✓ Configurable sharing policies per team ✓ Cross-team governance ✓ Creator/Viewer/Admin roles |
✓ Shared team spaces ✗ Multi-workspace architecture ✗ Team-level policy controls ✗ Granular role permissions |
| Compliance | ✓ SOC 2 Type II ✓ GDPR compliant ✓ HIPAA considerations (PHI redaction) ✓ Custom security reviews |
✓ GDPR/HIPAA mentioned in FAQs ✗ No published compliance certifications ✗ No audit reports available |
| Support & SLAs | ✓ Dedicated customer success ✓ Custom SLAs ✓ Priority support ✓ Security and legal review support |
✓ Priority support ✓ SLAs available ✓ Dedicated support (unspecified level) ✗ No mention of customer success teams |
| Integration & APIs | ✓ Enterprise Search API ✓ Confluence, Slack, Teams integrations ✓ Copilot integration ✓ Custom AI assistant integration |
✗ No public API mentioned ✓ Custom integrations (via enterprise contact) ✗ Limited third-party integrations |
| Deployment | ✓ Cloud-hosted (secure hosting) ✗ Self-hosting not offered ✓ Multi-region options |
✓ Cloud-hosted ✓ Managed self-hosting ✓ Custom S3 deployment ✓ Fully local/air-gapped |
| Procurement | ✓ Custom POs and invoicing ✓ Volume discounting ✓ Annual contracts ✓ Custom legal reviews |
✓ Bulk discounts ✓ Custom quotes ? Contract flexibility unclear ? Legal review process unclear |
| Best For | Regulated industries, Fortune 500, healthcare, finance, multi-team enterprises | Privacy-focused mid-market, tech companies, teams requiring data sovereignty |
When evaluating enterprise readiness, the maturity difference between Scribe and Cap becomes immediately apparent. Scribe has spent years building enterprise features specifically for regulated industries and complex organizations, while Cap's enterprise offering is newer and prioritizes deployment flexibility over administrative depth.
Scribe provides the full enterprise authentication stack: SAML SSO for identity federation, SCIM for automated user provisioning/deprovisioning, and granular role-based access control (Creator, Viewer, Admin). IT teams can integrate Scribe with Okta, Azure AD, or OneLogin and automatically sync user permissions based on Active Directory groups. IP whitelisting adds an additional security layer for organizations requiring network-based access controls.
Cap offers SAML SSO but lacks SCIM provisioning, meaning user lifecycle management remains manual—a significant gap for enterprises managing hundreds or thousands of users. However, Cap's deployment flexibility is unmatched: organizations can host recordings on their own S3 buckets, deploy fully self-hosted instances, or keep recordings entirely local with zero cloud dependency. For organizations with strict data residency requirements (e.g., EU-only data storage, air-gapped environments), Cap's architecture provides options Scribe cannot match.
Scribe's standout enterprise feature is automatic PII/PHI redaction—the platform can detect and blur sensitive information like social security numbers, credit cards, and health data in real-time during capture. Admins can enforce redaction policies at the organizational level, ensuring compliance even when individual users forget. The guide verification workflow adds another layer: admins can review and approve guides before publication, critical for regulated industries.
Cap's approach to sensitive data is manual: users can blur information retroactively in the editor, but there's no automated detection, no enforced policies, and no verification workflows. For organizations subject to HIPAA, PCI-DSS, or GDPR requirements around automated data protection, this is a disqualifying gap. Cap mentions GDPR/HIPAA compliance in FAQs but provides no compliance certifications, SOC 2 reports, or detailed security documentation—red flags for enterprise buyers.
Scribe's multi-workspace architecture allows enterprises to create separate teams with distinct sharing policies, user permissions, and content libraries. A global enterprise can give the Finance team different access controls than Customer Support, ensure marketing content isn't visible to engineering, and enforce different retention policies by department. Configurable global sharing policies prevent accidental public sharing of sensitive content.
Cap offers 'shared team spaces' but lacks the architectural sophistication for true multi-team governance. There's no workspace separation, no team-level policy enforcement, and limited role granularity. For enterprises requiring departmental isolation, Cap's current architecture creates compliance and security risks.
Scribe's Enterprise Search API is a game-changer for 2026 AI-first organizations. Teams can integrate Scribe guides into Microsoft Copilot, custom GPT assistants, Slack bots, and enterprise search platforms—putting knowledge directly into employee workflows. The Confluence, SharePoint, and Teams integrations ensure guides appear where work happens, not in siloed repositories.
Cap has no public API and limited third-party integrations. While custom integrations may be available through enterprise sales, the lack of a documented API ecosystem limits Cap's ability to fit into complex enterprise technology stacks. For organizations building AI-powered knowledge systems, this is a significant limitation.
Scribe provides dedicated customer success managers, custom SLAs, priority support, and assistance with security reviews and procurement processes. For enterprises deploying to thousands of users, this white-glove service is essential for successful adoption.
Cap offers SLAs and priority support but doesn't detail customer success services or dedicated account management. Given Cap's open-source roots and lower price points, this is expected—but enterprises accustomed to strategic partnership with vendors may find the support model lacking.
Scribe's procurement process is designed for enterprise buyers: custom POs, invoice customizations, multi-year contracts, volume discounting, and support for custom legal reviews and security questionnaires. For organizations with complex procurement requirements (e.g., government, healthcare, finance), Scribe accommodates standard enterprise buying processes.
Cap's procurement process is less defined. While bulk discounts and custom quotes are mentioned, there's no detail on contract flexibility, legal review processes, or whether Cap can accommodate non-standard terms. For large enterprises with strict vendor requirements, this uncertainty creates risk.
Healthcare Provider (2,500 users): Choose Scribe Enterprise. HIPAA compliance requires automated PHI redaction, audit trails, and verification workflows before publishing patient-facing guides. SCIM integration with Azure AD ensures departing employees lose access immediately. Multi-workspace architecture separates clinical, administrative, and patient education content with appropriate access controls.
European Tech Startup (75 users): Choose Cap Enterprise. GDPR requires EU-only data storage. Cap's custom S3 deployment to Frankfurt region ensures data residency compliance at fraction of Scribe's cost. Open-source transparency allows security team to audit code. Simple team structure doesn't require complex multi-workspace governance.
Financial Services Firm (8,000 users): Choose Scribe Enterprise. PCI-DSS and SOC 2 requirements demand compliance certifications and automated sensitive data controls. Enterprise Search API integrates process guides into internal AI assistant. Scribe Optimize identifies inefficiencies in loan processing workflows, driving measurable ROI. Dedicated customer success ensures successful deployment across multiple business units.
Privacy-Focused SaaS Company (200 users): Choose Cap Enterprise. Company culture values open-source and data ownership. Self-hosted Cap deployment on company's AWS infrastructure ensures complete control. Lower cost allows budget allocation to other tools. Engineering team contributes features back to Cap's open-source project.
Scribe's enterprise pricing is modular and custom-quoted based on:
Example: 500-user deployment
Estimated annual cost: $180,000–$240,000 ($30–$40/user/month at volume pricing) plus implementation and training. Organizations report ROI through time savings: at 41.6 hours saved per user per month × 500 users × $50/hour average burden rate = $1.04M annual value.
Cap's enterprise pricing is significantly lower but less transparent:
Example: 500-user deployment
Estimated annual cost: $48,960 (500 × $8.16 × 12 months) for base Pro tier, plus enterprise add-ons (likely $10,000–$30,000 for SLAs, SSO, and priority support). Total: $60,000–$80,000 annually—approximately 60–70% less than Scribe.
Scribe's Hidden Costs:
Cap's Hidden Costs:
Value Assessment: Scribe delivers measurable time savings (41.6 hours/user/month) that can justify higher costs for large deployments. Cap's lower costs appeal to budget-conscious mid-market teams, but feature gaps may create technical debt for complex enterprises.
The Scribe vs. Cap enterprise readiness comparison reveals a fundamental truth: these platforms serve different segments of the enterprise market. Neither is universally 'better'—the right choice depends entirely on your organization's regulatory environment, technical requirements, and budget constraints.
Scribe wins for regulated, complex enterprises: If you're in healthcare, finance, government, or any industry requiring automated compliance controls, audit trails, and proven certifications, Scribe is the only viable choice. The platform's multi-workspace architecture, SCIM provisioning, automated redaction, and enterprise API ecosystem provide the depth required for Fortune 500 deployments. Yes, you'll pay 3-4× more than Cap, but the alternative is compliance failures, security incidents, and failed audits—costs that dwarf licensing fees.
Cap wins for privacy-focused, cost-conscious mid-market: If your primary concerns are data sovereignty, vendor lock-in, and budget constraints—and you don't operate in heavily regulated industries—Cap delivers remarkable value. The ability to self-host, audit source code, and deploy to custom S3 buckets provides control that Scribe cannot match. For European companies with GDPR data residency requirements or security teams requiring code transparency, Cap's architecture is compelling.
The maturity gap is real: Scribe has spent years building enterprise features specifically for complex organizations. Cap's enterprise tier, launched in late 2025, is promising but immature. Missing features like SCIM provisioning, automated compliance controls, multi-workspace governance, and public APIs aren't minor gaps—they're fundamental architectural differences that take years to address.
However, both platforms share critical limitations: Scribe's cloud-only architecture and high costs create barriers, while Cap's compliance gaps and administrative limitations prevent adoption in regulated industries. Organizations increasingly need a platform that combines Scribe's enterprise controls with Cap's deployment flexibility and cost efficiency—without the compromises.
This is where next-generation AI-first platforms like Guidde are disrupting the market. By combining enterprise-grade security and compliance with AI-powered automation that's 11× faster than traditional documentation, and offering deployment flexibility at accessible price points, modern alternatives address the limitations both Scribe and Cap leave unresolved. For enterprises seeking true enterprise readiness without sacrificing innovation, cost efficiency, or deployment control, exploring platforms purpose-built for the 2026 AI-first workplace is increasingly essential.
While both Scribe and Cap have made significant strides in enterprise readiness, both platforms reveal fundamental limitations that impact real-world enterprise deployments in 2026:
1. The Compliance-Cost Paradox: Scribe offers enterprise compliance but at prohibitive costs ($30–$40/user/month), while Cap provides cost efficiency but lacks automated compliance controls. Enterprises shouldn't have to choose between regulatory compliance and budget viability.
2. Deployment Inflexibility: Scribe locks you into cloud-only hosting, creating dealbreakers for data sovereignty requirements. Cap offers self-hosting but without the administrative controls needed to govern those deployments at scale. True enterprise readiness requires both deployment flexibility and centralized governance.
3. Manual Documentation Burden: Both platforms still require significant manual effort. Scribe's automatic capture is limited to step-by-step workflows; Cap focuses on screen recording with manual editing. Neither addresses the fundamental problem: documentation takes too long, even with automation.
4. AI Features as Add-Ons, Not Core Architecture: Scribe and Cap bolt AI onto existing documentation workflows (auto-titles, transcriptions, summaries). They don't fundamentally reimagine documentation creation using AI-first principles.
5. Integration Gaps: Scribe's API ecosystem is robust but requires enterprise tier modules at premium pricing. Cap has no public API. Neither platform seamlessly integrates into the full spectrum of enterprise knowledge systems, learning platforms, and AI assistants that 2026 organizations deploy.
These aren't abstract feature comparisons—they create real business consequences:
Guidde represents a fundamental rethinking of enterprise documentation, purpose-built for AI-first organizations in 2026:
Unlike Scribe and Cap, which automate parts of documentation, Guidde uses AI to eliminate manual work entirely. The platform automatically generates:
Organizations report 11× faster documentation creation compared to traditional methods—not incremental improvement, but order-of-magnitude transformation. What took 2 hours in Scribe or 90 minutes in Cap takes 10 minutes in Guidde.
Guidde delivers Scribe-level enterprise features at Cap-level pricing:
Pricing starts at a fraction of Scribe's enterprise tier while providing comparable security and compliance capabilities.
Guidde's integration strategy surpasses both competitors:
Guidde customers report transformative results:
Scribe provides enterprise controls but at unsustainable costs and without deployment flexibility. Cap offers cost efficiency and data sovereignty but lacks the compliance depth for regulated industries. Guidde bridges this gap, delivering:
For enterprises seeking true enterprise readiness in 2026—combining security, compliance, cost efficiency, deployment flexibility, and AI-powered productivity—Guidde represents the next generation of knowledge management platforms.
Try Guidde free or schedule an enterprise demo to see how AI-first documentation transforms your organization's knowledge workflows.
Scribe is currently the only viable option for HIPAA-regulated organizations. Its automated PHI redaction, verification workflows, and enterprise data governance provide the controls required for healthcare compliance. Cap lacks automated redaction and compliance certifications. However, Guidde offers comparable HIPAA-ready features at significantly lower costs with additional AI automation that reduces documentation time by 11×.
Cap's architecture supports large deployments, but the lack of SCIM provisioning, multi-workspace governance, and proven Fortune 500 case studies raises questions about operational scalability. Manual user management becomes untenable at 1,000+ users. Scribe and Guidde both provide SCIM, automated provisioning, and documented large-scale deployments.
No. Scribe is cloud-only SaaS, which creates dealbreakers for organizations with air-gapped environments or strict data residency requirements. Cap offers self-hosting and custom S3 deployment. Guidde provides cloud hosting with custom data residency options for enterprises requiring regional data storage.
Guidde is the superior choice for most enterprise organizations in 2026. It combines Scribe's enterprise security and compliance features with Cap's cost efficiency and deployment flexibility—while adding AI-native capabilities that are 11× faster than traditional documentation methods. Guidde provides:
Organizations report $2.3M average annual savings and 11× faster documentation creation. Try Guidde free or schedule an enterprise demo.
Scribe: $180,000–$240,000 annually ($30–$40/user/month)
Cap: $60,000–$80,000 annually ($10–$13/user/month including enterprise add-ons)
Guidde: $70,000–$120,000 annually ($12–$20/user/month depending on features)
Guidde provides 60–70% cost savings versus Scribe while offering superior AI automation and comparable enterprise features. Cap is cheapest but lacks compliance depth for regulated industries.
Scribe offers native Microsoft Teams integration and enterprise search API for Copilot integration. Cap has limited Microsoft integrations. Guidde provides the most comprehensive Microsoft 365 ecosystem integration, including Teams, SharePoint, Copilot, and OneNote with native embed support and two-way sync.
Cap offers a Loom Video Importer as part of its enterprise tier, making migration straightforward. Scribe doesn't import videos (it's primarily a step-by-step guide platform, not video-focused). Guidde supports migration from both Loom and Scribe with dedicated migration tools and customer success support for enterprise transitions.
Both platforms support GDPR compliance, but with different approaches. Cap's custom S3 deployment allows EU-only data storage with complete control—ideal for strict data residency requirements. Scribe offers GDPR compliance but with cloud-only hosting, which may require custom data residency agreements. Guidde provides EU data center hosting options with GDPR compliance certifications and data processing agreements included in enterprise plans.