Whatfix vs. Loom: Features Comparison Guide 2026

What is Whatfix?

Whatfix is an enterprise-grade Digital Adoption Platform (DAP) that provides in-app guidance, interactive walkthroughs, and contextual help across web, desktop, and mobile applications. Acquired by private equity and valued at approximately $900 million as of 2024, Whatfix serves Fortune 1000 enterprises with complex software ecosystems.

Core Feature Categories

Whatfix's feature architecture spans four primary products:

• Digital Adoption Platform (DAP): In-app guidance including Flows (step-by-step walkthroughs), Smart Tips (tooltips), Task Lists, Pop-Ups, Self Help wikis, and Launchers for contextual support
• Product Analytics: No-code event tracking, user journey analysis, funnel insights, cohort analysis, and adoption health dashboards with up to unlimited tracked actions
• Mirror: Application simulation platform for hands-on training with automatic screen capture, interactive guided experiences, quizzes, and AI-powered roleplay scenarios
• Whatfix AI: ScreenSense technology for context-aware guidance, AI-powered authoring agents, insights agents, and automated content generation

Enterprise-Focused Feature Set

Whatfix is purpose-built for large organizations with features like SSO/SCIM authentication, IP whitelisting, audit logs, data residency selection, custom data retention, offline mode for desktop apps, virtual desktop support (Citrix/Azure), multi-language auto-translation, and automated testing for content validation.

The platform requires dedicated content authors and typically involves professional services for implementation, reflecting its enterprise positioning.

What is Loom?

Loom is an asynchronous video messaging platform designed for quick screen and camera recordings with AI-enhanced editing and sharing capabilities. Acquired by Atlassian in 2023, Loom serves over 25 million users across 400,000+ companies, ranging from individual creators to enterprise teams.

Core Feature Categories

Loom's feature set focuses on video creation and collaboration:

• Recording Capabilities: Screen and webcam capture up to 4K resolution, system audio recording, virtual backgrounds, background noise suppression, drawing tools, mouse emphasis, blur effects, and custom recording dimensions
• Loom AI Suite: Auto-titles, auto-summaries, auto-chapters, auto-CTAs, filler word removal, silence removal, video-to-text automation, AI-generated tasks, and auto-meeting notes/recaps (new in 2026)
• Video Editing: Trim and stitch clips, custom thumbnails, embed links, edit by transcript, add text/box/arrow overlays, variables for personalization, stylized captions, and live rewind
• Collaboration Features: Emoji reactions, threaded comments, video transcriptions in 50+ languages, closed captions, watch later lists, and engagement analytics
• Content Management: Unlimited spaces (on higher tiers), folders, video archiving, search functionality, and video uploads/downloads

Accessibility and Integration

Loom prioritizes ease of use with browser extensions, desktop apps (Mac/Windows), and mobile apps (iOS/Android). It integrates with Slack, Gmail, Notion, Jira, Confluence, GitHub, Salesforce, and numerous other tools via embeds, making it seamless to share videos across existing workflows.

The platform is designed for immediate productivity—users can start recording within minutes of signup, requiring no training or specialized roles.

Pricing and Features Comparison

Category	Whatfix	Loom
Free Plan	❌ Free trial only	✅ Up to 50 members, 25 videos, 5 min recordings
Entry Pricing	~$24,000-$32,000/year (Standard DAP)	$15/user/month ($180/year billed annually)
Primary Use Case	Enterprise software training & adoption	Video messaging & async communication
In-App Guidance	✅ Advanced (Flows, Smart Tips, Task Lists, Pop-Ups)	❌ Not available
Video Recording	⚠️ Export only (not primary function)	✅ Core feature (up to 4K, unlimited length)
AI Capabilities	✅ Content authoring, context detection, insights	✅ Auto-titles, summaries, editing, meeting notes
Analytics	✅ Deep behavioral analytics, funnels, cohorts	✅ Viewer insights, engagement metrics
Setup Complexity	High (requires implementation, content authors)	Low (instant setup, browser extension)
Mobile Support	✅ Separate mobile DAP product	✅ Native iOS/Android recording apps
Interactive Training	✅ Mirror for simulations, roleplays, quizzes	❌ Passive video only
Enterprise Security	✅ SSO, SCIM, IP whitelisting, data residency	✅ SSO (SAML), SCIM, custom retention (Enterprise)

Feature Deep Dive: Core Capabilities Analysis

1. Training & Onboarding Features

Whatfix is purpose-built for software training with interactive walkthroughs that guide users step-by-step through applications. Its Flows feature can automate data entry, validate user actions, and provide branching logic based on user behavior. The Mirror product creates safe sandbox environments where users can practice in replicas of live applications without risk.

Loom approaches training through video explanations. While effective for demonstrating processes, viewers remain passive—they watch but don't practice. There's no way to create interactive exercises or validate user understanding within the platform.

Key Difference: Whatfix enables active learning within applications; Loom enables passive knowledge transfer via video.

2. Content Creation Workflow

Whatfix requires dedicated content authors using the Whatfix Editor to build guidance experiences. Creation involves identifying UI elements, writing instructions, testing flows, and publishing to production environments. This process can take hours or days per workflow, but results in deeply integrated, context-aware guidance.

Loom makes content creation instant—click record, capture your screen, and share the link. With Loom AI (available on Business + AI at $20/user/month), the platform automatically generates titles, summaries, chapters, and removes filler words within seconds of finishing recording.

Key Difference: Whatfix demands significant upfront investment for sophisticated guidance; Loom prioritizes speed and simplicity.

3. Analytics and Insights

Whatfix Product Analytics provides enterprise-grade behavioral analytics with no-code event tracking, funnel analysis showing where users drop off in multi-step processes, user journey mapping across applications, cohort segmentation, and adoption health dashboards. On Premium plans, you can track unlimited user actions.

Loom offers viewer analytics showing who watched your video, how long they watched, which sections were replayed, and engagement rates. While useful for understanding video performance, it doesn't track broader application usage or user behavior beyond video consumption.

Key Difference: Whatfix analyzes application adoption patterns; Loom tracks individual video engagement.

4. AI and Automation Features

Whatfix AI (ScreenSense technology) understands application context and can automatically trigger relevant guidance based on user behavior. The platform includes AI authoring agents that help generate content faster, insights agents that surface anomalies and opportunities, and guidance agents that provide intelligent recommendations.

Loom AI focuses on post-recording enhancement: automatically removing filler words and silence, generating titles and summaries, creating chapters for easy navigation, adding auto-CTAs, extracting action items, and transcribing meetings. New in 2026 are auto-meeting notes and recap emails.

Key Difference: Whatfix AI enhances in-app training experiences; Loom AI enhances video quality and accessibility.

5. Integration Ecosystems

Whatfix integrates with enterprise applications via JavaScript deployment, allowing it to overlay guidance on Salesforce, SAP, Workday, ServiceNow, and custom applications. It connects with knowledge bases (SharePoint, Confluence) for content aggregation, LMS platforms for SCORM export, and analytics tools for data enrichment.

Loom integrates via embeds and apps with collaboration tools (Slack, Microsoft Teams), project management (Jira, Asana), CRM systems (Salesforce), and documentation platforms (Notion, Confluence). Videos can be embedded anywhere via URL or iframe.

Key Difference: Whatfix becomes part of applications; Loom shares videos across applications.

6. Scalability and Administration

Whatfix requires IT involvement for implementation, content governance frameworks, named Customer Success Managers, and author training programs. The platform provides audit logs, role-based access control, content lifecycle management, and engagement dashboards at the portfolio level.

Loom scales with minimal administration—users self-onboard via browser extension, create content independently, and share via simple links. Enterprise plans add SSO enforcement, SCIM provisioning, admin activity logs, and custom data retention policies.

Key Difference: Whatfix requires centralized governance; Loom enables distributed creation.

Best Use Cases for Each Platform

When Whatfix is the Right Choice

• Complex Enterprise Software Rollouts: Implementing new ERP, CRM, or HCM systems across thousands of employees who need contextual, in-app guidance
• Compliance-Critical Training: Industries like healthcare, financial services, or pharma requiring documented, validated user proficiency with audit trails
• Multi-Application Workflows: Organizations with processes spanning multiple systems (e.g., order-to-cash flows across SAP, Salesforce, and custom portals)
• Reducing Support Ticket Volume: Enterprises spending hundreds of thousands on IT support who need self-service help embedded in applications
• Application Analytics Needs: Product teams wanting to understand how users interact with internal tools or customer-facing applications
• Hands-On Training Simulations: Organizations requiring practice environments where employees can safely learn before working in production systems

When Loom is the Right Choice

• Async Communication: Remote or distributed teams replacing unnecessary meetings with quick video updates, feedback, or status reports
• Quick Explanations: Individual contributors needing to demonstrate bugs, explain design decisions, or provide feedback without writing lengthy emails
• Sales and Customer Success: Teams sending personalized video messages for outreach, onboarding, or support (especially with auto-CTA features)
• Simple Tutorial Creation: Creating straightforward 'how-to' videos for tools, processes, or products without complex interactivity needs
• Cross-Functional Collaboration: Designers sharing prototypes, engineers explaining technical concepts, or marketers reviewing campaigns with stakeholders
• Customer Education: SaaS companies creating help center videos, feature announcements, or release notes that customers can watch on demand

When You Need Both (or an Alternative)

Many organizations discover they need both capabilities—interactive training and easy video creation. Buying both platforms means:

• Managing two vendor relationships and contracts
• Training teams on two different tools
• Paying $24,000+ for Whatfix plus $15-20/user/month for Loom
• Creating content in two separate systems with no integration

This is where platforms like Guidde become compelling—combining AI-powered video creation with interactive documentation in one unified, affordable solution.

Detailed Pricing Analysis

Whatfix Pricing Structure

Whatfix uses enterprise custom pricing with a flat fee plus user license fees. Based on industry reports and user reviews:

• Standard Plan (DAP): Estimated $24,000-$32,000/year for single-application deployment with basic guidance features, limited integrations (2), manual translation, and 24/5 support
• Premium Plan (DAP): Estimated $40,000-$60,000+/year adding unlimited content aggregation, auto-translation, custom surveys, and enhanced analytics
• Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing (likely $80,000-$150,000+/year) for multi-app deployments with unlimited users, advanced features, and dedicated support
• Product Analytics: Free Standard plan with DAP purchase (25 tracked actions), Premium estimated $20,000-$40,000/year for unlimited tracking
• Mirror: Separate pricing, estimated $15,000-$30,000/year for simulation and roleplay training

Hidden Costs: Professional services for implementation, content author training, ongoing Customer Success Manager fees, and internal resources for content maintenance.

Value Proposition: For large enterprises with complex training needs across multiple applications and thousands of users, the cost-per-user can be reasonable ($10-50/user/year depending on scale). The ROI comes from reduced support costs, faster onboarding, and improved software adoption.

Loom Pricing Structure

Loom uses transparent per-user pricing:

• Starter: Free for up to 50 members, 25 videos per person, 5-minute recording limit, 720p quality, basic features
• Business: $15/user/month (billed annually) = $180/user/year for unlimited videos, unlimited recording time, 4K quality, basic editing, custom branding, priority support
• Business + AI: $20/user/month (billed annually) = $240/user/year adding Loom AI suite (auto-titles, summaries, filler removal, silence removal, meeting notes)
• Enterprise: Custom pricing (estimated $500-$10,000+/year minimum) for SSO, SCIM, advanced admin controls, custom data retention, 99.95% SLA, dedicated support

Cost Comparison Examples:

• 10-person team: Loom Business = $1,800/year ($150/month); Whatfix = Not practical (enterprise minimum too high)
• 100-person company: Loom Business = $18,000/year; Whatfix Standard = ~$30,000+/year
• 1,000-person enterprise: Loom Business = $180,000/year; Whatfix Enterprise = ~$80,000-$150,000/year (lower per-user cost at scale)

Value Proposition: Loom's pricing is straightforward and accessible for teams of any size. The free plan is genuinely useful for small teams, and paid plans scale linearly with headcount. No hidden fees or professional services required.

The Guidde Alternative

For organizations needing both video creation and interactive documentation, Guidde offers a compelling value proposition:

• Guidde pricing: Starting at $18/user/month for AI-powered video creation, interactive guides, and documentation
• vs. Whatfix + Loom: $24,000+ plus $15-20/user/month = $26,000+ per year for minimal deployment
• vs. Guidde: $216/user/year at scale, typically $2,000-$5,000/year for small-to-medium teams

Guidde creates content 11x faster than traditional tools while providing both video and interactive elements in one platform.

Honest Assessment: Strengths and Limitations

Whatfix Strengths

• Unmatched In-App Guidance: The most comprehensive digital adoption platform with sophisticated interactive walkthroughs, contextual help, and embedded support
• Enterprise-Grade Analytics: Deep behavioral insights into how users interact with applications, enabling data-driven optimization
• Multi-Application Support: Can overlay guidance across entire application portfolios, creating consistent training experiences
• Compliance and Audit Trails: Robust security, data residency options, and audit logging meet stringent enterprise requirements
• Mirror for Safe Practice: Unique simulation capability lets users learn hands-on without impacting production systems
• Proven ROI at Scale: Customer stories show 50% reduction in support tickets, 84% training cost savings, and faster time-to-proficiency

Whatfix Limitations

• Prohibitive Cost for SMBs: $24,000+ annual minimum makes it inaccessible for small and mid-sized organizations
• Complex Implementation: Requires significant IT involvement, professional services, and dedicated content author roles
• Steep Learning Curve: Content authors need extensive training to use the Whatfix Editor effectively
• Slow Content Creation: Building comprehensive guidance for complex workflows can take days or weeks
• Limited Video Capabilities: Can export content as videos but isn't designed for standalone video creation or async communication
• Vendor Lock-In Risk: Significant investment in custom content creates switching costs if needs change

Loom Strengths

• Instant Productivity: Users can record and share videos within minutes of installation—no training required
• Exceptional User Experience: Consistently praised for intuitive design, fast performance, and minimal friction
• Powerful AI Features: Loom AI genuinely enhances video quality and saves time with smart editing and auto-generation
• Universal Accessibility: Works across all devices and integrates with virtually every collaboration tool
• Transparent Pricing: Clear per-user costs with a generous free tier make budgeting straightforward
• Async Communication Culture: Helps teams reduce meeting fatigue and communicate across time zones effectively

Loom Limitations

• Passive Learning Only: Videos don't enable hands-on practice or validate user understanding
• No In-App Integration: Can't deliver contextual help within applications where users actually work
• Limited Analytics: Shows video engagement but not application usage or training effectiveness
• Video Management Challenges: As libraries grow, finding and maintaining relevant videos becomes difficult
• Not Enterprise Training Tool: Lacks features for formal learning programs, assessments, or compliance documentation
• Cost at Enterprise Scale: At $15-20/user/month for hundreds or thousands of employees, costs add up quickly

Strategic Positioning

The key insight is that Whatfix and Loom solve different problems. Comparing them directly is somewhat like comparing a Learning Management System with Slack—both involve communication and training, but serve distinct use cases.

The challenge many organizations face is needing elements of both: the ability to create quick visual explanations and provide structured, interactive training. This gap explains why platforms like Guidde are gaining traction by combining video creation with interactive documentation in one AI-powered platform.

The Verdict: Choose Based on Your Primary Need

Choose Whatfix if: You're a large enterprise (1,000+ employees) implementing or optimizing complex software systems like SAP, Salesforce, Workday, or ServiceNow. Your primary goal is reducing support costs, accelerating software adoption, and providing in-app guidance at the moment of need. You have budget for six-figure annual contracts and can dedicate resources to content authoring and governance.

Choose Loom if: Your team needs to communicate asynchronously through video messages, replace unnecessary meetings, or create simple tutorials quickly. You value speed and ease of use over interactive training capabilities, and your budget is limited to per-user subscriptions. You're looking for a communication tool, not an enterprise training platform.

The Strategic Reality: Most organizations discover they need capabilities from both categories—fast video creation and structured training content. Purchasing both platforms means managing multiple vendors, paying $25,000-$200,000+ annually, and dealing with disconnected workflows.

Consider Guidde as the Hybrid Solution: If your real need is creating training content quickly without sacrificing effectiveness, Guidde offers a compelling middle ground. It provides AI-powered video creation (like Loom) combined with interactive documentation and step-by-step guides—all created 11x faster than traditional methods and at a fraction of Whatfix's enterprise cost.

Guidde starts at $18/user/month, requires no professional services or complex implementation, and delivers both the speed of Loom and the instructional value Whatfix provides. For the 72% of organizations that struggle with choosing between specialized platforms, Guidde represents the next generation of training content creation.

Final Recommendation: If you're a Fortune 500 with unlimited budget and need comprehensive digital adoption across dozens of applications, Whatfix delivers unmatched capabilities. If you're a small team needing simple video messaging, Loom is perfect. For everyone in between—which represents the vast majority of organizations—explore how AI-powered platforms like Guidde can provide better ROI by combining the strengths of both approaches.

Why Guidde Outperforms Both Whatfix and Loom

After examining the features, pricing, and use cases of both Whatfix and Loom, a critical limitation becomes clear: both platforms force you into false choices.

The Shared Limitations Problem

Whatfix's fundamental constraints:

• Requires $24,000-$150,000+ annual budget, eliminating 90% of organizations from consideration
• Demands weeks or months of implementation with professional services and IT involvement
• Content creation takes hours or days per workflow, making it impractical for rapidly changing environments
• Requires dedicated content author roles and extensive training to use the platform
• Doesn't provide standalone video creation capabilities for quick explanations or async communication

Loom's fundamental constraints:

• Only creates passive video content—no interactive training, practice environments, or knowledge validation
• Cannot integrate contextually within applications to provide in-the-flow-of-work guidance
• Lacks structured documentation, step-by-step guides, or searchable knowledge bases
• Offers no analytics beyond individual video engagement—can't track overall training effectiveness or user proficiency
• Not designed for formal training programs, compliance documentation, or enterprise learning initiatives

How These Limitations Impact Your Organization

The practical result of these constraints:

• Budget Paralysis: Teams that need comprehensive training capabilities can't afford Whatfix's enterprise pricing
• Tool Sprawl: Organizations end up buying multiple platforms (Loom for videos, separate documentation tools, LMS systems), creating disconnected workflows
• Slow Content Velocity: Whether spending weeks building Whatfix flows or hours recording/editing/organizing Loom videos, content creation can't keep pace with business change
• Incomplete Solutions: Whatfix provides training but not quick communication; Loom enables communication but not effective training
• Poor User Adoption: Complex tools like Whatfix see low author engagement; simple tools like Loom produce content that doesn't drive learning outcomes

Enter Guidde: The AI-First Alternative

Guidde was purpose-built to solve precisely these limitations by combining the strengths of both approaches while eliminating their weaknesses:

1. Speed Without Sacrificing Quality

Guidde's AI captures your screen, automatically generates step-by-step documentation with screenshots and descriptions, and creates video guides in one workflow. This happens 11x faster than traditional content creation methods. Where Whatfix requires hours of authoring and Loom requires recording + editing + organizing, Guidde delivers polished training content in minutes.

2. Interactive + Video in One Platform

Unlike Loom's passive videos or Whatfix's complex flows, Guidde produces hybrid content: AI-generated videos paired with clickable, step-by-step documentation. Learners can watch, read, or follow along interactively—accommodating different learning styles without creating multiple content versions.

3. Accessible Enterprise Features

Guidde provides enterprise-grade capabilities—SSO, team workspaces, analytics, brand customization, and integrations—at 1/10th the cost of Whatfix. Starting at $18/user/month, even small teams can afford comprehensive training tools previously reserved for Fortune 500 companies.

4. Zero Learning Curve

Like Loom, Guidde requires no training—anyone can start creating content immediately with the browser extension. Unlike Whatfix's dedicated author roles, every team member becomes a content creator, democratizing knowledge sharing across your organization.

5. AI Does the Heavy Lifting

Guidde's AI automatically generates titles, descriptions, step explanations, voiceovers in 100+ languages, and organizes content into searchable knowledge bases. This eliminates the time-consuming editing and organization work required with Loom videos or the complex authoring demanded by Whatfix flows.

Measurable Outcomes with Guidde

Organizations switching to Guidde report:

• 11x faster content creation compared to traditional screen recording and documentation methods
• 87% reduction in support tickets by providing self-service, searchable training content
• 60% decrease in onboarding time with AI-generated, comprehensive learning paths
• 90% cost savings compared to enterprise DAP platforms while achieving similar or better adoption results
• 10x more content created because every team member can contribute, not just specialized authors

Guidde's Unique Differentiators

Capability	Whatfix	Loom	Guidde
AI-Generated Documentation	❌	❌	✅ Automatic step-by-step guides
Video + Interactive Content	⚠️ Separate products	❌ Video only	✅ Unified hybrid output
Time to First Content	Weeks (implementation)	Minutes	Minutes
Content Creation Speed	Hours per workflow	~20-30 min per video	~2-3 min per guide (11x faster)
Multilingual Support	Manual or auto-translation	50+ language transcriptions	100+ AI voiceovers
Entry Price Point	~$24,000/year	$180/user/year	$216/user/year
Professional Services Required	✅ Typically needed	❌	❌
Searchable Knowledge Base	✅ Via Self Help	⚠️ Basic search/folders	✅ AI-powered organization

The Next-Generation Approach

Whatfix represents the first generation of digital adoption—powerful but expensive and complex. Loom represents the video-first generation—fast but limited in training effectiveness. Guidde represents the AI-first generation—combining the speed of modern tools with the comprehensiveness of enterprise platforms, at a price point accessible to all organizations.

In 2026, you shouldn't have to choose between fast content creation and effective training. You shouldn't need a six-figure budget or specialized authors to create great learning experiences. And you shouldn't manage multiple disconnected tools when one AI-powered platform can do it all.

Take Action: Experience the Guidde Difference

• Try Guidde for free—no credit card required, no complex setup
• See how Guidde compares to your current tools in a personalized demo
• Explore detailed comparisons of Guidde vs. Whatfix and Guidde vs. Loom

The future of training content creation is AI-powered, instantly accessible, and affordable for every organization. That future is Guidde.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Whatfix and Loom be used together?

Technically yes, but it creates workflow friction and significantly increases costs ($24,000+ for Whatfix plus $15-20/user/month for Loom). Most organizations find managing two separate platforms for training and communication to be inefficient. A unified platform like Guidde provides both capabilities in one tool, eliminating the need to manage multiple vendors and systems.

Which tool is better for software training?

Whatfix is purpose-built for comprehensive software training with in-app guidance and simulations, but requires significant investment ($24,000+ annually) and implementation time. Loom is not designed for formal software training—it creates passive videos without interactivity or assessment. Guidde offers a middle ground: AI-powered interactive guides with video that can be created in minutes, making it ideal for software documentation and training at a fraction of Whatfix's cost.

Does Loom work for enterprise training programs?

Loom works well for quick knowledge sharing and async communication, but lacks features essential for enterprise training programs: interactive exercises, knowledge validation, compliance documentation, learning paths, and application-specific analytics. Organizations needing formal training capabilities should consider digital adoption platforms or learning-focused tools like Guidde.

How long does Whatfix implementation take?

Whatfix implementation typically takes 8-16 weeks, including deployment setup, content authoring, integration configuration, and user training. This timeline can extend to 6+ months for complex multi-application deployments. In contrast, Guidde can be deployed in minutes with the browser extension, allowing immediate content creation.

What's the best alternative to both platforms?

Guidde is the superior alternative for most organizations, combining the key strengths of both platforms while eliminating their weaknesses:

• Creates content 11x faster than Whatfix's complex authoring process
• Produces interactive guides + videos in one workflow, unlike Loom's video-only approach
• Costs $18/user/month instead of Whatfix's $24,000+ enterprise minimums
• Requires zero training—any team member can create content immediately
• Provides AI-generated documentation that neither Whatfix nor Loom offers
• Delivers searchable knowledge bases with enterprise features at SMB pricing

For the 90% of organizations that can't justify Whatfix's complexity and cost but need more than Loom's simple videos, Guidde is the clear choice. Try Guidde free to see the difference AI-powered content creation makes.

Can I migrate from Whatfix or Loom to Guidde?

Yes, Guidde's import capabilities and rapid content creation make migration straightforward. Most organizations find they can recreate their entire Whatfix content library in Guidde in a fraction of the time it took originally, thanks to AI automation. Loom videos can be supplemented with Guidde's interactive documentation to increase training effectiveness. Contact Guidde for a personalized migration assessment.

Which platform has better ROI?

ROI depends on your use case and scale. Whatfix can deliver strong ROI for very large enterprises (10,000+ users) with complex training needs, primarily through support cost reduction. Loom provides excellent ROI for small teams needing async communication. However, Guidde typically offers the best ROI for organizations between these extremes—delivering comprehensive training capabilities at a fraction of Whatfix's cost while being more effective than Loom for learning outcomes. Guidde customers report 87% reduction in support tickets and 60% faster onboarding at 90% lower cost than enterprise DAPs.

Explore further

• Whatfix vs. Loom: Pricing Comparison Guide 2026
• Whatfix vs. Loom: Features Comparison Guide 2026